766
Programming / Re: Base size & damage calculation
« on: August 25, 2014, 06:59:31 am »
I would like to request that the Damage Calculation be stored in Ruleset somewhere so that it can be custom edited.
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email? November 09, 2024, 12:44:59 am
Did you miss your activation email? November 09, 2024, 12:44:59 am
News: If you can't login, please contact us with your username and e-mail so we can fix it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
767
Programming / Re: Ufopaedia screens for Armor and Vehicles
« on: August 25, 2014, 05:30:48 am »
Wow those are some EXCELLENT tanks man, very realistic to the way they would probably be designed.
I wasnt aware that Google Sketchup was capable of building complex models like that, I thought it had restrictions on what kind of surfaces/shapes you could build with it.
In respect to the UfoPaedia UI style . . . I always thought tthe detailed graphical style and orientation of the TFTD UfoPaedia was just over the top. It could have been improved upon, but not by much. It was one of the parts (among many) that I enjoyed about that game, over the original.
I wasnt aware that Google Sketchup was capable of building complex models like that, I thought it had restrictions on what kind of surfaces/shapes you could build with it.
In respect to the UfoPaedia UI style . . . I always thought tthe detailed graphical style and orientation of the TFTD UfoPaedia was just over the top. It could have been improved upon, but not by much. It was one of the parts (among many) that I enjoyed about that game, over the original.
768
Programming / Re: Depixelating
« on: August 25, 2014, 05:17:53 am »
I have to agree somewhat with Hythlodaeus
This aint so great for real-time rendering.
However what it is good for is Resizing Upsampling in general.
So if you were going to Resize basic XCOM sprites to be 2.5 or 3 times their existing resolution, so that you can save them and use them as High Resolution Sprites . . .
This would be an excellent way to do that.
To generate enhanced game resources on-disk.
Not sure that algorithm is available though?
This aint so great for real-time rendering.
However what it is good for is Resizing Upsampling in general.
So if you were going to Resize basic XCOM sprites to be 2.5 or 3 times their existing resolution, so that you can save them and use them as High Resolution Sprites . . .
This would be an excellent way to do that.
To generate enhanced game resources on-disk.
Not sure that algorithm is available though?
769
Programming / Re: New Feature: Infinite base sizes, POLL
« on: August 25, 2014, 04:15:03 am »Quote
How about "infinite" terrain size? It would feel more real if one could wander "endlessy" into any direction. Alien movement could still be roughly restricted to the same old terrain size so mission complexity/length would not change much.
wollow - Ive thought of the same thing, for another game similar to xcom and the conclusion I reached was that in Real Time Strategy thats feasible but in Turn Based its a hassle. Also there are mechanical limitations after awhile.
As for the Base Size . . . yeah it should be bigger.
But the one I was thinking of also included Multiple Floors as well . . . different levels of the base structure that had basically facilities stacked on top of facilities (but I am not suggesting that for openxcom).
What I propose is the ability to INCREASE the Size Limits of things but NOT make them infinite.
Lets just say for now . . . up to 2 times the size allowed in both axes, for Base Development, and for Battlescape. (and in a way I think the two would have to be linked as well, since increasing base size would dictate a potential increase in battlescape).
And I think normal Battlescape missions should start out standard size, but if any of the player's controlled characters LOOK to a place which is off the map (say within 10 tiles of them) it extends the map by another line of map pieces. Same goes if someone Throws something near the edge of the map and because of inaccuracy it would get tossed off the map - put a Map Piece there to catch it (then after it lands, conjure up the other Map Pieces on that X/Y grid line)
That way it only extends the map on demand if it has to.
770
Suggestions / Weapon has Capacity for multiple Ammo Mags
« on: August 25, 2014, 04:02:40 am »
Okay so check this out . . . we know the ammo mag carries the ammo capacity for the gun.
But what if the gun can also be loaded up with multiple ammo mags at the same time.
Obviously they would have to be the same kind of ammo magazines.
But you could have more than one loaded into the weapon at a time.
So you could have a 4 Shot Rocket Launcher which is reloaded with Rockets, but each Rocket only carries 1 capacity. So the shooter can dump 4 rockets into the rocket launcher but they will need to store any additional rockets in their backpack/etc one at a time.
Example Image
I mean with stuff like the Halo Rocket Launcher its easy because the launcher has fixed tubes of two shots, but not all weapons are like that, and if you have a launcher that can load multiple individual rounds at a time it may be more balancing or practical to just have each one of them separate.
Or with the Autocannon you can just basically connect one belt of ammunition to the next, in effect stacking up the number of magazines for AC ammo that have been loaded into the weapon
Easy enough to add this . . .
maxMagazines:
(lack of it defaults to 1 if it has any compatibleAmmo)
The companion to this, a different feature but something that might often be used in conjunction with it. . .
ammoPerShot:
(for every time this weapon shoots, it eats this many shots from the magazine, but still only shoots once)
(on a sidenote, I cant seem to find how the HWP Cannon is able to define a capacity of 30 shots for HWP Cannon shells, yet unlike all other weapons "HWP Cannon Shells" ammo is only ordered 1 shot at a time - - thats what reminded me of this suggestion because it looks like the HWP Cannon already does this by accepting up to 30 magazines of HWP Cannon Shells at a time. The aircraft cannon works in a similar way, allowing up to 200 shots, but that means accepting up to 4 magazines of Cannon Rounds which each have a capacity of 50 shots)
But what if the gun can also be loaded up with multiple ammo mags at the same time.
Obviously they would have to be the same kind of ammo magazines.
But you could have more than one loaded into the weapon at a time.
So you could have a 4 Shot Rocket Launcher which is reloaded with Rockets, but each Rocket only carries 1 capacity. So the shooter can dump 4 rockets into the rocket launcher but they will need to store any additional rockets in their backpack/etc one at a time.
Example Image
I mean with stuff like the Halo Rocket Launcher its easy because the launcher has fixed tubes of two shots, but not all weapons are like that, and if you have a launcher that can load multiple individual rounds at a time it may be more balancing or practical to just have each one of them separate.
Or with the Autocannon you can just basically connect one belt of ammunition to the next, in effect stacking up the number of magazines for AC ammo that have been loaded into the weapon
Easy enough to add this . . .
maxMagazines:
(lack of it defaults to 1 if it has any compatibleAmmo)
The companion to this, a different feature but something that might often be used in conjunction with it. . .
ammoPerShot:
(for every time this weapon shoots, it eats this many shots from the magazine, but still only shoots once)
(on a sidenote, I cant seem to find how the HWP Cannon is able to define a capacity of 30 shots for HWP Cannon shells, yet unlike all other weapons "HWP Cannon Shells" ammo is only ordered 1 shot at a time - - thats what reminded me of this suggestion because it looks like the HWP Cannon already does this by accepting up to 30 magazines of HWP Cannon Shells at a time. The aircraft cannon works in a similar way, allowing up to 200 shots, but that means accepting up to 4 magazines of Cannon Rounds which each have a capacity of 50 shots)
771
Suggestions / In Soviet Russia, UFO chases You.
« on: August 25, 2014, 02:15:53 am »
Engage in air combat with a big beefy UFO and rather than running away at some point . . . instead it decides its going to CHARGE you and shoot down your interceptor.
No more sitting there for what seems like days plugging away at battleships, terror ships, and supply ships. They know they're tough, and you're not. And they're going to prove it, by chasing you down and eliminating your pestulant flying toys.
So there you have it.
* If enabled for an enemy ship, and its maximum speed is greater than yours, after a certain period of time it will force "Aggressive" air combat mode and lock you out from being able to fly away. And its a fight to the death.
* If more than one interceptor is present as a valid target, it can only charge one of them at a time, but unless it is close to being shot down (lower than 60% max damage remaining) the alien ship will continue down the list after each one of your interceptors is shot down.
I suppose there could also be a interception AI mode where one of these ships that detects one of your ships close to it will change course, intercept you, and do all of the above.
* * * For those of us who like our Games as Hard as our Liquor.
No more sitting there for what seems like days plugging away at battleships, terror ships, and supply ships. They know they're tough, and you're not. And they're going to prove it, by chasing you down and eliminating your pestulant flying toys.
So there you have it.
* If enabled for an enemy ship, and its maximum speed is greater than yours, after a certain period of time it will force "Aggressive" air combat mode and lock you out from being able to fly away. And its a fight to the death.
* If more than one interceptor is present as a valid target, it can only charge one of them at a time, but unless it is close to being shot down (lower than 60% max damage remaining) the alien ship will continue down the list after each one of your interceptors is shot down.
I suppose there could also be a interception AI mode where one of these ships that detects one of your ships close to it will change course, intercept you, and do all of the above.
* * * For those of us who like our Games as Hard as our Liquor.
772
Suggestions / Re: [SUGGESTION-UNCUT][#067] New game mechanism: Aliens Escape Mission
« on: August 25, 2014, 02:07:25 am »
+1 Ive always loved the idea of having the aliens escape from containment. A bunch of sci-fi movies are built around that premise anyway.
"We've got a BREACH!"
I wonder exactly HOW do you keep a Sectopod or Cyberdisk on ice anyway. Do they know where its secret "off" switch is? What happens when a UFO passes by and sends it wireless activation bypass codes. Besides its not exactly like you can take its weapon away, that thing is kinda on and loaded all the time.
But anyway, any alien that escaped would set all of its compatriots free.
Including any live aliens that are currently being researched (because as the Psi-Network is re-established in the local collective, it gets up off the table).
As for what weapons they get to use . . . hmm they have free reign of probably 50% of any weapons and ammunition that are available for each item type. And aliens arent stupid, they dont have to research "human weapons" to be able to use pistols, rifles, laser weapons, etc. But obvioously they would arm themselves up with the best of what you have.
They just cant use the HWPs.
It would be nice for a change to see a Sectoid carrying a plain old Rifle and throwing plain old Grenades (gees that reminds me of Battlestar Galactica though).
Yeah id say it was just a flat rate % chance every month, regardless of the number of aliens or the number of alien containment rooms you have. If it scores a hit then it picks some time during that month when it will happen (rather than predictably happening on the 1st of the month).
A low enough chance that the average game will probably see 1 of these incidents occur during its span, but not a regular thing.
"We've got a BREACH!"
I wonder exactly HOW do you keep a Sectopod or Cyberdisk on ice anyway. Do they know where its secret "off" switch is? What happens when a UFO passes by and sends it wireless activation bypass codes. Besides its not exactly like you can take its weapon away, that thing is kinda on and loaded all the time.
But anyway, any alien that escaped would set all of its compatriots free.
Including any live aliens that are currently being researched (because as the Psi-Network is re-established in the local collective, it gets up off the table).
As for what weapons they get to use . . . hmm they have free reign of probably 50% of any weapons and ammunition that are available for each item type. And aliens arent stupid, they dont have to research "human weapons" to be able to use pistols, rifles, laser weapons, etc. But obvioously they would arm themselves up with the best of what you have.
They just cant use the HWPs.
It would be nice for a change to see a Sectoid carrying a plain old Rifle and throwing plain old Grenades (gees that reminds me of Battlestar Galactica though).
Yeah id say it was just a flat rate % chance every month, regardless of the number of aliens or the number of alien containment rooms you have. If it scores a hit then it picks some time during that month when it will happen (rather than predictably happening on the 1st of the month).
A low enough chance that the average game will probably see 1 of these incidents occur during its span, but not a regular thing.
773
Suggestions / Re: Making Base Defense Facilities More Useful
« on: August 25, 2014, 01:50:41 am »
Easy . . .
Dont just have Battleships conduct the attack on the base.
Terror Ships are the other offensive weapon the aliens use and they only have a damage capacity of 1200, which means 600 points and they're down.
Thats the low-baller attempt to attack your base for a certain period of time, which missile defenses and laser defenses would be able to handle it (three units of them would give you a decent chance).
It would have no effect on the type or number of personnel that were invading the base.
Dont just have Battleships conduct the attack on the base.
Terror Ships are the other offensive weapon the aliens use and they only have a damage capacity of 1200, which means 600 points and they're down.
Thats the low-baller attempt to attack your base for a certain period of time, which missile defenses and laser defenses would be able to handle it (three units of them would give you a decent chance).
It would have no effect on the type or number of personnel that were invading the base.
774
Suggestions / Re: XCOM "Last Stand" Mode after Council Termination
« on: August 25, 2014, 01:45:09 am »
In the XCom spinoff clone I was designing there was a Last Stand scenario, but in addition to having to still fight the aliens without any new income . . . you also had Rogue Ops spring up all over the place like the tv show Alias.
(basically multiple MiB factions)
And eventually they would just roll you with a State Sponsored Army, as some big player out there in the world (like Russia or the USA) fell under complete control to the aliens and they were told to take you out no holds barred.
You'd get to fight through the final battle if you wished, but you would die no matter what, just like one of those endless survival mode zombie games. And they wouldnt be using pea shooters either, they'd have tanks, and they'd have at least all of the (better than usual) starting equipment, plus some alien tech here and there.
Then again there was going to be weapons of mass destruction in the game too, even on the battlefield mode (there was a Backpack sized plasma bomb with a yield of 50 Tons). And that would kill some of your soldiers each time even in the best armor the game had to offer, if not TPK them.
(because explosion damage would do a seeking algorithm and would bounce off of walls, so it wraps around corners and with a huge blast radius it would be able to nail people behind cover)
But really the Last Stand scenario doesnt hold water for XCom.
Its fair to say that if the whole world turns its back on you, and throws their lot in with the aliens.
They have all the data on the books about where your bases are, the computer codes to break in the mainframe, and so on.
And with all that assistance the Aliens would say it was "their pleasure" to mop you up.
Then you have a massive worldwide operation with 10's of Battleships being crammed down your throat at every base.
(basically multiple MiB factions)
And eventually they would just roll you with a State Sponsored Army, as some big player out there in the world (like Russia or the USA) fell under complete control to the aliens and they were told to take you out no holds barred.
You'd get to fight through the final battle if you wished, but you would die no matter what, just like one of those endless survival mode zombie games. And they wouldnt be using pea shooters either, they'd have tanks, and they'd have at least all of the (better than usual) starting equipment, plus some alien tech here and there.
Then again there was going to be weapons of mass destruction in the game too, even on the battlefield mode (there was a Backpack sized plasma bomb with a yield of 50 Tons). And that would kill some of your soldiers each time even in the best armor the game had to offer, if not TPK them.
(because explosion damage would do a seeking algorithm and would bounce off of walls, so it wraps around corners and with a huge blast radius it would be able to nail people behind cover)
But really the Last Stand scenario doesnt hold water for XCom.
Its fair to say that if the whole world turns its back on you, and throws their lot in with the aliens.
They have all the data on the books about where your bases are, the computer codes to break in the mainframe, and so on.
And with all that assistance the Aliens would say it was "their pleasure" to mop you up.
Then you have a massive worldwide operation with 10's of Battleships being crammed down your throat at every base.
775
Suggestions / Re: Armoured cilivans?
« on: August 25, 2014, 01:21:11 am »
On Terror Missions add another faction >>> Police Forces
Its a faction allied with XCom but counts as Civilians for point penalty losses.
They would be wearing crap armor (25 rating at most).
They would have a high multiplier for explosive damage (like 1.5x to 2x)
So you can shoot them by accident with a pistol or rifle and they wont die, but don't you dare toss a grenade next to them, because their body armor wont protect them from it.
They would be carrying Pistols and have 1 spare clip.
They would be carrying a Stun Rod.
They would engage the AI behavior of avoiding being seen by enemy forces as much as possible.
And they have Very Low Reactions (but at least they will open fire on their own turn if an enemy is close).
If you want to you can give them a Shotgun which is basically a carbon copy of a Heavy Cannon but with 8 rounds capacity @ 40 damage each (slug shells). It doesn't have to be a purchasable or recoverable weapon.
On some terror missions you can replace all of the civilians with Police Forces - - they having evacuated all of the regular civilians but (like in the Dark Knight Rises batman movie) they are trapped in the terror mission zone now, and are little more than helpless civilians themselves. They might score a kill or two over the course of the mission, but you know how them aliens just love to toss alien grenades and go autofire with a plasma gun that does 80+ damage.
Compared to XCom weaponry a .50bmg is fairly weak, it doesn't even get out of the 40 damage range. Whoever made the Sniper Rifle Mod got the damage value correct (46 points). I guess an exploding tip .50bmg might cause something like 52 or 55 damage, but its going to still do armor piercing damage type.
The in-game Heavy Cannon is supposedly something like a (high pressure) 20mm or 25mm grenade launcher, and the armor piercing ammunition is likely some kind of incendiary-armor piercing-exploding tip round that does alot of nasty damage on a direct hit to compensate for its slower velocity (which warrants its 52 damage points).
For a real life example of this check out the XM-25 grenade launcher.
(Image Link)
(yeah I wouldnt want one pointed at me either)
The HWP Cannon does 60 and its probably firing a de-facto 20mm Cannon round like what the NTW-20 sniper rifle does (which the Halo Combat Evolved Sniper Rifle was patterned after).
(this is a pic of a 20mm compared to a .50cal --- Image Link)
Last time I checked Mutons could take like 5 to 10 shots from stuff like that, and thats if they dont turn around and Reaction-Fire on the guy shooting them and put three blazing plasma rifle holes in them.
(and speaking of Halo Combat Evolved, almost none of those weapons the aliens use even come close to doing what XCom's plasma weapons do. The Halo "Beam Rifle" or "Binary Rifle" might do like 70 damage at most and that tears Master Chief in half as it is. The plasma pistols and plasma rifles that the Covenant use dish out like 35-40 damage at most, though I guess they would still count as causing plasma damage type, gotta give them that. I mean look at how awesome the Rocket Launcher is in Halo Combat Evolved? That weapon does 100 damage in Xcom)
The Plasmacastor from Predator is what im always reminded of when I think of Xcom Plasma Guns . . . 80 damage probably, and I think it could be said that weapon had a small blast radius attached to it.
Its a faction allied with XCom but counts as Civilians for point penalty losses.
They would be wearing crap armor (25 rating at most).
They would have a high multiplier for explosive damage (like 1.5x to 2x)
So you can shoot them by accident with a pistol or rifle and they wont die, but don't you dare toss a grenade next to them, because their body armor wont protect them from it.
They would be carrying Pistols and have 1 spare clip.
They would be carrying a Stun Rod.
They would engage the AI behavior of avoiding being seen by enemy forces as much as possible.
And they have Very Low Reactions (but at least they will open fire on their own turn if an enemy is close).
If you want to you can give them a Shotgun which is basically a carbon copy of a Heavy Cannon but with 8 rounds capacity @ 40 damage each (slug shells). It doesn't have to be a purchasable or recoverable weapon.
On some terror missions you can replace all of the civilians with Police Forces - - they having evacuated all of the regular civilians but (like in the Dark Knight Rises batman movie) they are trapped in the terror mission zone now, and are little more than helpless civilians themselves. They might score a kill or two over the course of the mission, but you know how them aliens just love to toss alien grenades and go autofire with a plasma gun that does 80+ damage.
Quote
well keep in mind that x-com's default rifle only uses a 6.7mm round... i doubt that even a muton could hold up very well to a 50bmg
Compared to XCom weaponry a .50bmg is fairly weak, it doesn't even get out of the 40 damage range. Whoever made the Sniper Rifle Mod got the damage value correct (46 points). I guess an exploding tip .50bmg might cause something like 52 or 55 damage, but its going to still do armor piercing damage type.
The in-game Heavy Cannon is supposedly something like a (high pressure) 20mm or 25mm grenade launcher, and the armor piercing ammunition is likely some kind of incendiary-armor piercing-exploding tip round that does alot of nasty damage on a direct hit to compensate for its slower velocity (which warrants its 52 damage points).
For a real life example of this check out the XM-25 grenade launcher.
(Image Link)
(yeah I wouldnt want one pointed at me either)
The HWP Cannon does 60 and its probably firing a de-facto 20mm Cannon round like what the NTW-20 sniper rifle does (which the Halo Combat Evolved Sniper Rifle was patterned after).
(this is a pic of a 20mm compared to a .50cal --- Image Link)
Last time I checked Mutons could take like 5 to 10 shots from stuff like that, and thats if they dont turn around and Reaction-Fire on the guy shooting them and put three blazing plasma rifle holes in them.
(and speaking of Halo Combat Evolved, almost none of those weapons the aliens use even come close to doing what XCom's plasma weapons do. The Halo "Beam Rifle" or "Binary Rifle" might do like 70 damage at most and that tears Master Chief in half as it is. The plasma pistols and plasma rifles that the Covenant use dish out like 35-40 damage at most, though I guess they would still count as causing plasma damage type, gotta give them that. I mean look at how awesome the Rocket Launcher is in Halo Combat Evolved? That weapon does 100 damage in Xcom)
The Plasmacastor from Predator is what im always reminded of when I think of Xcom Plasma Guns . . . 80 damage probably, and I think it could be said that weapon had a small blast radius attached to it.
776
Suggestions / Re: [WEAPONS] Make BlastRadius efficient for any DamageType
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:54:05 am »
How DOES the BlastRadius modifier work anyway?
Ive been looking at the rulesets and they have custom defined sizes like blastRadius: 5 for Alien grenades and blastRadius: 10 for Blaster Launchers . . .
Does that mean that it Truncates any explosion size beyond 5 or 10 squares from ground zero . . . or is it actively modulating the amount of damage that decreases with each square?
(as in a Blaster does 200 damage, normally its -10 damage per square so if you got blastRadius: 10 it inherently suggests that since it would normally have a radius of 20 squares and you're throttling it to 10 . . . it must multiply the amount of damage that is reduced by 20/10 = -20 per square)
^ ^ ^ Is that the way it works?
In other news . . . making any weapon explode regardless of its damage type would be as easy as segregating the Explosion Formula from the various radiant damage types . . . and just giving any weapon that might cause an explosion a blastRadius: . . . . which in effect "turns on" the explosion function for that weapon.
That way you can also have weapons that cause Explosive damage without causing an area of effect (like those .75 cal Bolters from Warhammer 40000 . . . it blows up inside you so there's no blast radius, but it still does explosive damage too)
The next step after that would be adding a Subheading for blastRadius: which defined which type of Explosion Sprite it uses for generating the explosion fireball. But that's later on down the line.
(then you can make your very own green colored fireballs for your plasma grenades just like on Game Of Thrones)
Ive been looking at the rulesets and they have custom defined sizes like blastRadius: 5 for Alien grenades and blastRadius: 10 for Blaster Launchers . . .
Does that mean that it Truncates any explosion size beyond 5 or 10 squares from ground zero . . . or is it actively modulating the amount of damage that decreases with each square?
(as in a Blaster does 200 damage, normally its -10 damage per square so if you got blastRadius: 10 it inherently suggests that since it would normally have a radius of 20 squares and you're throttling it to 10 . . . it must multiply the amount of damage that is reduced by 20/10 = -20 per square)
^ ^ ^ Is that the way it works?
In other news . . . making any weapon explode regardless of its damage type would be as easy as segregating the Explosion Formula from the various radiant damage types . . . and just giving any weapon that might cause an explosion a blastRadius: . . . . which in effect "turns on" the explosion function for that weapon.
That way you can also have weapons that cause Explosive damage without causing an area of effect (like those .75 cal Bolters from Warhammer 40000 . . . it blows up inside you so there's no blast radius, but it still does explosive damage too)
The next step after that would be adding a Subheading for blastRadius: which defined which type of Explosion Sprite it uses for generating the explosion fireball. But that's later on down the line.
(then you can make your very own green colored fireballs for your plasma grenades just like on Game Of Thrones)
777
Work In Progress / Re: [Mod Request/Idea] Conventional Wepons
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:36:04 am »
The BIG HUGE feature request that you ought to be considering when it comes to Conventional Weapons is . . .
Weapons which have a Sub Weapon Attached to them.
M-4 Carbine with M203 Grenade Launcher
M-41 Pulse rifle with 30mm Grenade Launcher
As simple as it sounds though, I can understand why its not implemented yet - because I can see how it isnt really that simple to implement. (but it would be possible, just you couldnt separate the weapons from each other, even back at the base - its effectively one weapon which has another weapon Linked to it, and you can switch modes which switches it to the other weapon).
My suggestion if it was ever attempted, would be to just have an auxiliaryWeapon: option for a weapon which refers to a different weapon which is not a standalone and has no weight or size/storage stats.
The Auxiliary weapon would be accessed from the Firing Menu (aimed/snap/auto/etc) . . . something like "Swap Weapon" (which could even have a TU cost associated with it, representing having to flip a switch or reach for the other weapon's trigger).
Then the Weapon is effectively treated as if it is now the Auxiliary Weapon >>> the firing menu has firing mode options for the Aux Weapon, the Inventory still treats it as if it was the full size weapon but regarding ammunition it shows and deals with the ammo in the Aux Weapon rather than the primary.
(going one step further, though unnecessary, it could also change the sprite of the weapon showing the Auxiliary Portion of the weapon highlighted in Red or something, to indicate that part of the weapon is now selected >> I guess that could be the Sprite for the Aux Weapon itself though modders would be responsible for making those sprites).
(EDIT - - - Of course the easy way to do that is just have the Auxiliary Weapon itself have the same stats as the Primary Weapon . . . having the Primary one link to the Auxiliary, and the Auxiliary one have a revertsTo: option so that the weapon "transforms back" into the primary in any situation where the weapon has to go back into inventory shelf mode. That way switching an M4 Carbine to its M203 launcher isnt going to put it in the Base Inventory as an M203 Launcher . . . it just goes back on the shelf as its Parent weapon. The reverting itself could be done automatically . . . but being able to choose which thing it reverts to can give modders evil ideas about weapons mutating and transforming into other things after every mission)
The primary reason this would be beneficial for modders is you can build Underbarrel attachments based on advanced technology . . .
Using Xcom tech as an example . . . Mounting a Plasma Pistol to the bottom of a Rifle.
Or mounting Special Purpose auxiliary weapons to the gun.
Taking this a step further, down into the depths of hair spaghetti monster hell . . .
Modular Weapon Upgrades
Which work like the above but rather than linking the weapon to another weapon
It replaces or changes things about the existing one, transforming it into something else.
Example - Laser power booster for a Laser Pistol, making it look like it has a Silencer on the end of it basically. Increases the size of the laser pistol to 1x3 and increases its damage. But if you take it off it turns it back into a regular laser pistol again.
(in a similar vein you could make it to where the Laser Rifle itself is just a Laser Pistol with an attached Power Booster and Fitted Stock - - - like in the 90's incarnation of the movie Lost In Space where they had "build a better blaster" kits)
Im not saying these are feature requests, just one possible direction to take things (eventually, sorta, maybe).
Like the idea I had for Overpenetration.
Weapons which have a Sub Weapon Attached to them.
M-4 Carbine with M203 Grenade Launcher
M-41 Pulse rifle with 30mm Grenade Launcher
As simple as it sounds though, I can understand why its not implemented yet - because I can see how it isnt really that simple to implement. (but it would be possible, just you couldnt separate the weapons from each other, even back at the base - its effectively one weapon which has another weapon Linked to it, and you can switch modes which switches it to the other weapon).
My suggestion if it was ever attempted, would be to just have an auxiliaryWeapon: option for a weapon which refers to a different weapon which is not a standalone and has no weight or size/storage stats.
The Auxiliary weapon would be accessed from the Firing Menu (aimed/snap/auto/etc) . . . something like "Swap Weapon" (which could even have a TU cost associated with it, representing having to flip a switch or reach for the other weapon's trigger).
Then the Weapon is effectively treated as if it is now the Auxiliary Weapon >>> the firing menu has firing mode options for the Aux Weapon, the Inventory still treats it as if it was the full size weapon but regarding ammunition it shows and deals with the ammo in the Aux Weapon rather than the primary.
(going one step further, though unnecessary, it could also change the sprite of the weapon showing the Auxiliary Portion of the weapon highlighted in Red or something, to indicate that part of the weapon is now selected >> I guess that could be the Sprite for the Aux Weapon itself though modders would be responsible for making those sprites).
(EDIT - - - Of course the easy way to do that is just have the Auxiliary Weapon itself have the same stats as the Primary Weapon . . . having the Primary one link to the Auxiliary, and the Auxiliary one have a revertsTo: option so that the weapon "transforms back" into the primary in any situation where the weapon has to go back into inventory shelf mode. That way switching an M4 Carbine to its M203 launcher isnt going to put it in the Base Inventory as an M203 Launcher . . . it just goes back on the shelf as its Parent weapon. The reverting itself could be done automatically . . . but being able to choose which thing it reverts to can give modders evil ideas about weapons mutating and transforming into other things after every mission)
The primary reason this would be beneficial for modders is you can build Underbarrel attachments based on advanced technology . . .
Using Xcom tech as an example . . . Mounting a Plasma Pistol to the bottom of a Rifle.
Or mounting Special Purpose auxiliary weapons to the gun.
Taking this a step further, down into the depths of hair spaghetti monster hell . . .
Modular Weapon Upgrades
Which work like the above but rather than linking the weapon to another weapon
It replaces or changes things about the existing one, transforming it into something else.
Example - Laser power booster for a Laser Pistol, making it look like it has a Silencer on the end of it basically. Increases the size of the laser pistol to 1x3 and increases its damage. But if you take it off it turns it back into a regular laser pistol again.
(in a similar vein you could make it to where the Laser Rifle itself is just a Laser Pistol with an attached Power Booster and Fitted Stock - - - like in the 90's incarnation of the movie Lost In Space where they had "build a better blaster" kits)
Im not saying these are feature requests, just one possible direction to take things (eventually, sorta, maybe).
Like the idea I had for Overpenetration.
778
Programming / Re: [Missing feature?] Base Defences - Damage range
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:16:34 am »
Slightly off topic question but . . .
The Damage Randomization code . . .
Is it a straight linear roll or is it a "two dice" roll?
Original XCOM 1 always used a linear roll . . . Rand * (2 * Damage)
However TFTD used a double roll . . . Damage * (Rand + Rand)
So like if you have a Plasma Pistol it would do Rand * (52x2) possible damage, but if you used the TFTD method it would do (52 * Rand) + (52 * Rand).
This is the reason the damage values were usually so uniform in TFTD, it wasnt because it was restricted to 50-150% (though Explosion damage always was).
I very much like and prefer the double roll precision from TFTD and im wondering if thats what you guys are using from the "TFTD style" damage dice rolls.
If so is there any way to Mod this as a normal change without doing any kind of actual cpp coding?
The Damage Randomization code . . .
Is it a straight linear roll or is it a "two dice" roll?
Original XCOM 1 always used a linear roll . . . Rand * (2 * Damage)
However TFTD used a double roll . . . Damage * (Rand + Rand)
So like if you have a Plasma Pistol it would do Rand * (52x2) possible damage, but if you used the TFTD method it would do (52 * Rand) + (52 * Rand).
This is the reason the damage values were usually so uniform in TFTD, it wasnt because it was restricted to 50-150% (though Explosion damage always was).
I very much like and prefer the double roll precision from TFTD and im wondering if thats what you guys are using from the "TFTD style" damage dice rolls.
If so is there any way to Mod this as a normal change without doing any kind of actual cpp coding?
779
Tools / Re: sprite tools
« on: August 25, 2014, 12:07:54 am »
Is it possible to change the size of the PROJECTILES?
I understand 3x3 was enough for Xcom
But id like to experiment with larger projectiles (like a big orb plasma blast, or smoke trail that expands) . . . So id be shooting for 7x7. Any normal size ones id just transpose.
Are the projectile image placements (per tic/frame?) centered or has the 3x3 size already been figured into their alignment on the trajectory path . . . ?
I understand 3x3 was enough for Xcom
But id like to experiment with larger projectiles (like a big orb plasma blast, or smoke trail that expands) . . . So id be shooting for 7x7. Any normal size ones id just transpose.
Are the projectile image placements (per tic/frame?) centered or has the 3x3 size already been figured into their alignment on the trajectory path . . . ?
780
Tools / Re: Any way to rip DOS music from .cat files both from UFO: EU and TftD?
« on: August 24, 2014, 11:59:35 pm »
What id like to know is how to extract the Sound Effects, my guess is to use some kind of data ripper, i dont see any utilities listed here for extracting sounds or creating (vanilla) sound packs.