OpenXcom Forum

OpenXcom => Open Feedback => Topic started by: michal on March 10, 2018, 12:47:32 pm

Title: 2.0 ?
Post by: michal on March 10, 2018, 12:47:32 pm
Soon, it will be 4 years since 1.0 has been released. What's status of 2.0 ?
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Hobbes on March 10, 2018, 03:38:22 pm
Rule #1 of Openxcom: you don't ask about 2.0 ;)
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Yankes on March 10, 2018, 03:38:48 pm
We could skip 2 and go directly to 3 or 4 :)
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Human Ktulu on March 12, 2018, 10:04:05 pm
Hi,

MorphOS user can wait new port for sooooo long time ;D
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: The Reaver of Darkness on March 13, 2018, 12:23:10 am
What we need is a 1.1. And no, I'm not going to stop asking for it. There's a ton of nightlies that would be perfectly good for slapping the 1.1 label onto. It needs to happen so that people stop falling into the 1.0 newbie trap.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: niculinux on March 15, 2018, 02:51:32 pm
What we need is a 1.1. And no, I'm not going to stop asking for it. There's a ton of nightlies that would be perfectly good for slapping the 1.1 label onto. It needs to happen so that people stop falling into the 1.0 newbie trap.

I'd humly agree. Maybe an "intermediate" milestone between 1.0 and more advanced nightlies. At least it may allow to run mods designed for 1.0 with the nightlies file structure (mod folder and so on) :)
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Xenon on March 31, 2018, 10:05:05 pm
I have played this game since 1994. I just reinstalled it from steam for my son, and it (of course) doesn’t look right and the sound is messed up. I found this and saw that it has a ton of things that make the game better. But I’m confused about which version I should get and how I install it. The installation videos are years old. And you guys mention a noob 1.0 trap. Can you give me some advice and explain what the trap is? I am really eager to play with all the upgrades (even just the ones in 1.0).
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Solarius Scorch on March 31, 2018, 10:19:51 pm
I have played this game since 1994. I just reinstalled it from steam for my son, and it (of course) doesn’t look right and the sound is messed up. I found this and saw that it has a ton of things that make the game better. But I’m confused about which version I should get and how I install it. The installation videos are years old. And you guys mention a noob 1.0 trap. Can you give me some advice and explain what the trap is? I am really eager to play with all the upgrades (even just the ones in 1.0).

Just ignore 1.0 and get a nightly. It's much newer, self-contained, and there are no problems with it.

You can also try the OXCE+ branch, which is basically the same but with more options/quality of life improvements. You don't really need it for the standard game, though.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Xenon on April 01, 2018, 12:50:37 am
Thank you! I can’t wait to try it.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: davide on April 01, 2018, 09:54:27 am
Without wishing to harm anyone,
in mine opinion,
in practice, version "2.0" is the Yankes / Meridian fork :-X
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Meridian on April 01, 2018, 10:58:34 am
Not quite, we're at version 3.10 already :)
Soon reaching 4.0...
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Yankes on April 01, 2018, 11:01:05 pm
Not quite, we're at version 3.10 already :)
Soon reaching 4.0...
If my is 3.10, then our is 6.30 :>
I think is safe to say that difference between  OXC and OXCE is comparable to difference between OXCE and OXCE+
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: DiceMaster on June 16, 2018, 10:33:24 am
I continue to see people playing 1.0 because they "downloaded it from the official site". We really need something like 1.1 to stop this madness. "Latest Milestone 1.0" on the site is really a trap.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Solarius Scorch on June 16, 2018, 04:34:41 pm
I continue to see people playing 1.0 because they "downloaded it from the official site". We really need something like 1.1 to stop this madness. "Latest Milestone 1.0" on the site is really a trap.

Of course we do. :P
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: The Reaver of Darkness on June 16, 2018, 06:25:54 pm
"Latest Milestone 1.0"
Someone should change the text to say "Earliest Milestone 1.0". It would be just as technically accurate, yet far less misleading.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Yankes on June 23, 2018, 12:50:20 am
I think we could do another simple solution, add word "old" to "Milestone" instead of "Latest", this will redirect most of people to nightly.

[ps]

And reduce font of "1.0" and increase font size of date.

[ps]

something like this:
Code: [Select]
<div class="timer">
Old Milestone<br>
<a href="https://openxcom.org/downloads-milestones/"><span class="nightly">1.0</span></a><br>
Latest Nightly<br>
<a href="https://openxcom.org/git-builds/"><span class="stable">2018-06-22
</span></a>
</div>
I dropped time from date because it not fit page.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: niculinux on August 15, 2018, 08:39:24 pm
Or adopt, and show, a progressive number versio eg. 2.1, 2.2 and show on the page, instead of both "old" and "lates"?
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: Hobbes on August 15, 2018, 09:40:35 pm
It has now been 0 days since 2.0 was last mentioned.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: The Reaver of Darkness on August 16, 2018, 12:32:22 pm
I'm here, just lurking.
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: BBHood217 on September 10, 2018, 02:18:23 pm
Download link for 1.0 is gone and the milestones section is under construction.

Hmm...
Title: Re: 2.0 ?
Post by: The Reaver of Darkness on September 10, 2018, 05:19:40 pm
It has finally happened!  ;D