1
The X-Com Files / Re: APCs
« on: November 08, 2019, 12:17:15 am »
´´ ..tanks,
..or any hellicopters, /milit.aircraft, too
..or any hellicopters, /milit.aircraft, too
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email? May 17, 2024, 03:39:51 am
Did you miss your activation email? May 17, 2024, 03:39:51 am
News: If you can't login, please contact us with your username and e-mail so we can fix it.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
The X-Com Files / Re: APCs
« on: November 08, 2019, 12:15:35 am »
^^ iagree,
it would be ideally, best done as it is in C & C, where APC and infantry, (troops), individual soldiers are made and function quite realistically, - at base, troops , soldiers load into APC vehicles, /tanks, 1 ~or more armored transporters, and/or tanks, they drive soldiers just right on battlefield, (tactical map), where unload troopers, and then
but then ALSO these APCs, tanks actively drive and FIGHT on local, tactical battlefield.. (tactic.map)
~exactly as like in C & C
it would be ideally, best done as it is in C & C, where APC and infantry, (troops), individual soldiers are made and function quite realistically, - at base, troops , soldiers load into APC vehicles, /tanks, 1 ~or more armored transporters, and/or tanks, they drive soldiers just right on battlefield, (tactical map), where unload troopers, and then
but then ALSO these APCs, tanks actively drive and FIGHT on local, tactical battlefield.. (tactic.map)
~exactly as like in C & C
3
The X-Com Files / Re: Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 07, 2019, 08:51:48 pm »
^^ nesca, coffe 
:p
:p
4
XPiratez / Re: Re: [MAIN] XPiratez - K2 - 2 Nov - Ice Ice Cool
« on: November 07, 2019, 07:26:06 pm »
..so, let totaly clean the Earth, from various scum from (not only) outer space,
and let make settle the order,
and tide the garbage off
and let make settle the order,
and tide the garbage off
5
The X-Com Files / Re: Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 07, 2019, 07:05:45 pm »
^^ couldnt´t be possible train them again beyond the stats´caps ?
6
XPiratez / Re: Bugs & Crash Reports
« on: November 07, 2019, 06:48:16 am »
from what program (editor) do you get such image ? (this bottom pic.)
(..and what exactly is it, any 3d graph of fps, frame per seconds, or such?
(..and what exactly is it, any 3d graph of fps, frame per seconds, or such?
7
Work In Progress / all vehicles actively playable,driving and fighting in battles (on tactical map)
« on: November 06, 2019, 07:39:53 pm »
^^little 1idea:>
~~ all vehicles (not only cars and APCs) would be as actively playable, - driving and fighting in battles (on tactical map), - yes
.. - yep, ~ exactly like an APC´, carriers, and attack hellicopter also (in role of) as transporting units in C&C, Command and Conquer series
so, such land vehicles would be heavier armed with any bigger guns, and,/or rapid-fire (twin) cannons, /some rockets, /missiles, /tank-flamenthrowers, etc..
(and any machineguns too, minimal ~12,7
or gatling, GAU'; ~~25~30mm
..if yu, the team got a APC, / MBTank in garage, hangar, - why would not use it to its full potential, and possibilities? ?
~~ all vehicles (not only cars and APCs) would be as actively playable, - driving and fighting in battles (on tactical map), - yes
.. - yep, ~ exactly like an APC´, carriers, and attack hellicopter also (in role of) as transporting units in C&C, Command and Conquer series
so, such land vehicles would be heavier armed with any bigger guns, and,/or rapid-fire (twin) cannons, /some rockets, /missiles, /tank-flamenthrowers, etc..
(and any machineguns too, minimal ~12,7
or gatling, GAU'; ~~25~30mm
..if yu, the team got a APC, / MBTank in garage, hangar, - why would not use it to its full potential, and possibilities? ?
8
The X-Com Files / Re: Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 06, 2019, 07:39:04 am »
what is "readiness?
9
XPiratez / Re: Re: [MAIN] XPiratez - K2 - 2 Nov - Ice Ice Cool
« on: November 06, 2019, 04:41:11 am »
what happnd to magus
10
Work In Progress / APC - frame concept (draft| , parameters, description, suggestions..
« on: November 06, 2019, 02:08:00 am »
the usually APCs ( "OT", or *BVP, Bojové Vozidlo Pechoty, ~ Infantry(?) Fighting Vehicle )
should have been, & should have these :
Armored (fighting) Transporter
- he definately WOULD have at LEAST (but better really 2) 1 mount'ed weapon pods.. for lightier weapons,
( = ..up to ~~30 ~ 50 mm Melara, /Bushmasters, etc rapid-fire autocannon.. - as in automatic weapons ("turret") platform
en plus:
1x 12,7 ~ 16mm heavy machine gun, hard-mounted on pod
1 ~ 2 x 7,6 light machinegun, mounted on flexible, rotating, circle -turn-able pod
..and speed again:
top speed ~75 ~ 90 ( ~ max. ~100) mph (km/h) would be more fitting for that armored troops carrier
travel, transport range:
Sources:>
Google:> Namer APC wiki
( Namer, & Eitan AFV )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowag_Piranha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowag_Piranha_V
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puma_(AFV)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puma_(IFV)
should have been, & should have these :
Armored (fighting) Transporter
- he definately WOULD have at LEAST (but better really 2) 1 mount'ed weapon pods.. for lightier weapons,
( = ..up to ~~30 ~ 50 mm Melara, /Bushmasters, etc rapid-fire autocannon.. - as in automatic weapons ("turret") platform
en plus:
1x 12,7 ~ 16mm heavy machine gun, hard-mounted on pod
1 ~ 2 x 7,6 light machinegun, mounted on flexible, rotating, circle -turn-able pod
..and speed again:
top speed ~75 ~ 90 ( ~ max. ~100) mph (km/h) would be more fitting for that armored troops carrier
travel, transport range:
Sources:>
Google:> Namer APC wiki
( Namer, & Eitan AFV )
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowag_Piranha
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mowag_Piranha_V
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puma_(AFV)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puma_(IFV)
11
The X-Com Files / Re: APCs
« on: November 06, 2019, 01:35:01 am »
@Marrik agree,
iagree with all of yu,
the usually APCs ( "OT", or *BVP, Bojové Vozidlo Pechoty, ~ Infantry(?) Fighting Vehicle )
should have been, & should have these :
Armored (fighting) Transporter
- he definately WOULD have at LEAST (but better really 2) 1 mount'ed weapon pods.. for lightier weapons,
( = ..up to ~~30 ~ 50 mm Melara, /Bushmasters, etc rapid-fire autocannon.. - as in automatic weapons ("turret") platform
en plus:
1x 12,7 ~ 16mm heavy machine gun, hard-mounted on pod
1 ~ 2 x 7,6 light machinegun, mounted on flexible, rotating, circle -turn-able pod
..and speed again:
top speed ~75 ~ 90 ( ~ max. ~100) mph (km/h) would be more fitting for that armored troops carrier
travel, transport range:
iagree with all of yu,
the usually APCs ( "OT", or *BVP, Bojové Vozidlo Pechoty, ~ Infantry(?) Fighting Vehicle )
should have been, & should have these :
Armored (fighting) Transporter
- he definately WOULD have at LEAST (but better really 2) 1 mount'ed weapon pods.. for lightier weapons,
( = ..up to ~~30 ~ 50 mm Melara, /Bushmasters, etc rapid-fire autocannon.. - as in automatic weapons ("turret") platform
en plus:
1x 12,7 ~ 16mm heavy machine gun, hard-mounted on pod
1 ~ 2 x 7,6 light machinegun, mounted on flexible, rotating, circle -turn-able pod
..and speed again:
top speed ~75 ~ 90 ( ~ max. ~100) mph (km/h) would be more fitting for that armored troops carrier
travel, transport range:
12
The X-Com Files / Re: Surfing mission gear list?
« on: November 06, 2019, 01:30:57 am »
^^ ~~
:DDD lôl
lôl you thCurse, you
:lôl
..such Magnum, or ;375 Beretta, in pants
:DDD lôllôl you thCurse, you
:lôl
..such Magnum, or ;375 Beretta, in pants
13
The X-Com Files / Re: Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 05, 2019, 09:57:58 pm »
^^Michael Crighton would be surely quite excited, surprised, & very like´d with thats X-Com mods, such thriller´ish, and techno-dramatic!
..and Those "Catching Creatures" missions just remind me abit Witcher, (novel & game serie), too alike
..and Those "Catching Creatures" missions just remind me abit Witcher, (novel & game serie), too alike
14
The X-Com Files / Re: Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 04, 2019, 11:44:04 pm »
i´m just catching such big green frog :p lôl
can,could she be stunned too ? (i wouldn´t want to shoot, kill her yet)
:p lôlcan,could she be stunned too ? (i wouldn´t want to shoot, kill her yet)
15
The X-Com Files / Re: The X-Com Files - 1.0: Judgement Day
« on: November 04, 2019, 08:25:07 pm »Oh yeah rat armor needs to happen XD
Or alloy teeth.
Rat power armor
With mounted laser
Perhaps flying would be a bit much though.
(There´s just been a study where they taught rats to drive small electric cars...)
I have 4 pet rats and they´re always scurrying around, very fast and very trainable animals...
And you do *NOT* want to get bit, if they´re serious about it.
Perfect for a fast ambush or just mass overwhelming your enemies
Could post some pictures for ufopedia entries or dossiers, but I´m really not good at downsampling image size and color palette to make it fit. :/
(Also thats why i kinda dislike the animal missions with rats. Weird enough the enemy dogs don't really bother me. I´m a monster...)
Maybe as attack animation jumping to half body height would be fitting, since they actually do that. Also its weird that you just got killed by a rat biting your shoe...
haha
lôlhere you go! :
https://www.idnes.cz/technet/veda/potkani-krysy-mysi-ridi.A191023_153010_veda_mla